AUDIO PODCAST

INTRO: WHY THIS DISCUSSION MATTERS—WE STAND AT A CROSSROADS OF AGES AND EMPIRES

We are not merely experiencing a technological upgrade—we are living through a civilisational upheaval. The world as we know it is shifting beneath our feet. Economically, socially, politically, and spiritually, the systems that sustained the past are now cracking under the weight of their own obsolescence. The Fourth Turning is upon us—that generational crisis cycle where institutions are dismantled and rebuilt, where the old guard collapses and new orders emerge. It is a time of both threat and threshold.

---

The birth pangs of AI are not accidental; they coincide with cultural exhaustion, institutional distrust, political polarisation, economic instability, and a deep spiritual hunger. People are disoriented. Leaders falter. Narratives compete for dominance. In moments like these, those who perceive the times rightly, like the sons of Issachar, will not only endure but shape what comes next.

This is why it is no longer sufficient for Christians to merely respond. We must anticipate. We must become builders again—wise as serpents, harmless as doves—co-labouring with God not only to protect what is sacred, but to advance the Kingdom in unprecedented ways. The AI revolution is not just a technological phase; it is a spiritual invitation. Either we abdicate our role to technocrats and transhumanists, or we rise to steward this moment with vision, integrity, and generational impact.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT: AGES & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

Astrologers have long divided human history into “Great Ages” of roughly 2,000 years each, tied to the Zodiac. In this view, each astrological age “parallels major changes in the development of human society, culture, history, and politics.”

One common timeline labels the Age of Taurus (~4300–2150 BCE)–marked by the Bronze Age, early writing, and bull cults in Sumer, Egypt and the Indus Valley. This was followed by the Age of Aries (~2150 BCE–1 CE), encompassing the Iron Age and the rise of ancient Israel, Greece and Rome. Around the turn of the eras, the Age of Pisces (~1–2150 CE) saw the Christian “fish” (ichthys) symbol emerge in the Roman Empire and later Islam. (Astrologers note that the fish symbol of early Christianity aligns with Pisces, and Jung similarly associated Christ’s birth/death with the Pisces era.)

Astrological Age	Approx. Years	Historical Themes & Symbols
Taurus (Bull)	~4300–2150 BCE	Bronze Age civilizations (Sumer, Egypt, Indus)； Near Eastern bull cults. (Biblical: golden calf episode c.13th c.BCE, destroyed by Moses.)
Aries (Ram)	~2150 BCE–1 CE	Iron Age, Axial Age civilizations (Israel, Greece, Persia), martial energy (ram). (Biblical: Jesus “Lamb of God” symbol, end of this era with Christian Redeemer.)
Pisces (Fish)	~1–2150 CE	Roman Empire; Christianity and Islam rise (fish “ichthys” symbol of Christ). Spiritual focus and world religions flourish.

In symbolic terms, Moses’ destruction of the golden calf (Exodus 32) can be seen as breaking the bull idol of Taurus (he “burnt the golden calf…ground it to powder and scattered it on water”). Likewise, Christ’s crucifixion (the “Lamb of God”) and the early church’s adoption of the fish symbol marked the new Piscean epoch. (Astrologers stress these as transition symbolisms, but mainstream historians note that Egypt and other civilizations were already advanced by Moses’ time.)

Anthropologists and historians also identify broad stages of human development. One framework (echoing Theosophy and sociological theories) notes three basic eras: pre-agricultural (hunter-gatherers), agrarian (Neolithic farming to ancient empires), and post-axial (modern world religions and science). For example, Robert Ellwood observes that before agriculture humans were tribal, then after agriculture societies grew with cities, writing and priesthoods, and finally the Axial Age (c.800–200 BCE) introduced major religious/philosophical systems. This mirrors the astrological scheme: Taurus/Age-of-Bronze corresponds to early agriculture and kingdoms; Aries/Age-of-Iron and Greek culture align with the Axial revolution; Pisces/Age-of-Faith aligns with global empires and organized religions.

WESTERN ECONOMIC ERAS

A similar multi-stage pattern appears in Western economic history. Prior to the 18th century, the economy was predominantly agrarian: most people lived rurally and worked the land. The 18th–19th centuries brought the Industrial Revolution (c.1760–mid-1800s), beginning in Great Britain. Steam engines (e.g. Watt’s engine) and mechanized looms massively increased production, “harnessing steam and water-power to reduce dependence on human physical labor”. Britain’s coal abundance and high wages accelerated this change.

luddite, 1811, the name taken by an organised band of weavers in Midlands and northern England who for about 5 years thereafter destroyed machinery, for fear it would deprive them of work. Supposedly they got it from Ned Ludd, a Leicestershire worker who in 1779 had smashed two machines in a rage, but that story first was told in 1847. Applied by 1961 to modern spurners of automation and technology. As an adjective from 1812.

Luddite (n.)

Important, those who do not study history are doomed to make the same mistakes. The world is changing and only those who are proactive will navigate it effectively and find their place in the “new world.”

TABLE: WESTERN ECONOMIC PHASES

Anthropological	Phase	Era (approx.)	Key Features & Transitions
Physical 1	Agrarian Economy	Until ~1750 CE	Farm-based, cottage industries; stable rural societies
Physical 2	Industrial Era	~1760–early 20th CE	Factories, steam engines, railways; urbanization; mass production
Intellectual 1	Information Age	Mid-20th century–present	Computer/internet era; data networks; service economies; rapid communication
Intellectual 2	AI/Automation Era	21st century onward	Artificial intelligence and automation; data-driven decision-making; cognitive technologies

The Information Age (also called the Digital or Computer Age) began in the mid-20th century with the invention of the transistor (1947) and digital computers. This period is “characterized by a rapid shift from traditional industries (Industrial Revolution) to an economy centered on information technology”. Today we are entering an AI era, where machine learning and automation are rapidly transforming industries. (Astrologically, some say Aquarius will be associated with this technological revolution.)

Within each broad era, we notice a two-part pattern: a physical phase (agrarian → industrial) followed by a more intellectual/technological phase (information IT → AI). In the agrarian age, the first industrial “phase” replaced hand labor with machines; now in the information age, we see computers augmenting and in many instances, replacing intellectual (mind) work, and AI poised to further replace routine cognitive tasks. Theories like Schumpeter’s long waves or Kondratiev cycles likewise describe material/energy revolutions followed by information revolutions.

ECCLESIASTICAL VOICES ON TRANSITIONS

️Where were the church voices in all of this? And what did they have to say about the crisis and the choke-points? Society was transiting through yet another choke-point, another birth-process to push society forward. The birth-process is not very pleasant, but we look forward, toward the joy of new life that birth produces. IT (Information technology) was in the womb and now it comes to fruition as AI (Artificial Intelligence).

“When a woman [society, nation, civilisation] is giving birth, she has sorrow because her hour has come [crisis, transition], but when she has delivered the baby [advancement, technology, AI] , she no longer remembers the anguish [discomfort from crisis], for joy that a human being [new life, development] has been born into the world.” (John 16:21)

EXAMPLES OF CHURCH VOICES

Were they in fear or in faith, were they resistant to change, or urging trust in god given wisdom?

Name / Title	Time Period	Transition Phase	Voice	Key Stance
Ultramontanist Bishops (e.g., Pius IX)	1848–70s	Agrarian → Industrial	Resistance	Opposed liberalism, rationalism, early industrial disruptions; upheld traditional Church authority (e.g., Syllabus of Errors, Vatican I)
Cardinal Henry Manning (Britain)	1870s–1880s	Industrial	Adoption & advocacy	Spoke for farmers (1872) and dock workers (1889); supported Church policies on dignified labor
John Griffith (Wales, Anglican Priest)	1846–1885	Industrial	Advocate	Promoted workers’ rights, social uplift, education; supported mechanics institutes
Church Association for Advancement of Labor	Founded 1887	Industrial	Advocate	Episcopal clergy pushed for labor rights, arbitration, union support under gospel principles
Bishop Steven Croft (Church of England)	2023–Present	IT → AI	Balanced adoption	Advocates ethical AI, warns against over-reliance on tech, affirms human dignity and face-to-face engagement
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew	2025	IT → AI	Ethical guidance	Encourages innovation but underscores safeguarding human-centric wisdom and dignity
Pope Francis & Pope Leo XIV	2013–Present	IT → AI	Ethical engagement	Issued Antiqua et nova; warn of AI’s perils while calling for human dignity, justice, worker protection

KEY FIGURES: TIMELINES, ROLES & BIOS

Name	Period	Transition	Role	Short Bio / Notes
Pius IX	1846–1878	Agrarian → Industrial	Pope	Rejected liberalism in Syllabus of Errors; oversaw Vatican I (1870) defending papal authority; responded to social change by reinforcing ecclesiastical power
Henry Edward Manning	1870s–1890s	Industrial	Cardinal (Britain)	Championed workers rights (1872 farmers, 1889 dockers); initiated Church social doctrine response to capitalism
John Griffith	1846–1885	Industrial	Anglican Priest (Wales)	Rector/vicar advocating education, workers’ welfare, social institutes amid industrial expansion
Church Association for Labor	From 1887	Industrial	Clergy-led group	Episcopal clergy formed CAIL to defend labor rights, promote arbitration and union support
Bishop Steven Croft	2020s	IT → AI	Bishop of Oxford	Co-chaired AI ethics group in UK Parliament, emphasises tech with human connection and spiritual community
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew	2025	IT → AI	Orthodox Patriarch	Warns of “robotocracy,” insists on human-centric values in AI deployments
Pope Francis & Pope Leo XIV	2013–Present	IT → AI	Popes of the Catholic Church	Issued AI ethics encyclicals and documents (Antiqua et nova), urging regulation, worker dignity, human agency, echoing industrial-era teachings
Father Philip Larrey	2023–Present	IT → AI	Priest & academic, Vatican advisor	Works on Magisterium AI, co-leads conferences, bridges AI innovation and Catholic theology

---

SUMMARY REFLECTION

• During the Industrial Revolution, many church leaders advocated adaptation—especially via Catholic social thought (Rerum Novarum) and Anglican/Episcopal labour movements.
• Some traditionalists (e.g., Pius IX) resisted liberal and rationalist currents tied to industrialisation, focusing on ecclesial authority.
• In the IT→AI transition, there are clear ecclesiastical voices calling for ethical engagement rather than blind adoption or rejection:
  • Orthodox, Catholic, and Anglican leaders contributing to AI ethics discourse,
  • Developing church-led AI tools (Magisterium AI),
  • Convening platform events (e.g., UK, Melbourne),
  • Issuing Vatican guidance emphasising dignity, regulation, and public good.

Takeaway: Across eras, the Church has had both cautious resistors and proactive adaptors, with modern Christian thought intentionally positioning itself as a moral and spiritual guide through AI change.

EXAMPLES OF TECHNOLOGICAL TRANSITIONS AND THE DEMOCRATISATION OF CONSUMPTION

Throughout history, key technological breakthroughs have exponentially increased productivity, particularly in the production and distribution of calories and goods, often with surprisingly minimal additional effort or resource expenditure per person. Before the Industrial Revolution, a single individual’s daily calorie output—from farming, gathering, and manual labour was limited by physical endurance and rudimentary tools. For example, a pre-industrial farmer could produce just enough food to sustain themselves and perhaps a small family or community, relying on animal labour or hand tools for tilling and harvesting.

Contrast this with today’s scenario: modern agricultural technologies—mechanised tractors, irrigation systems, synthetic fertilisers—allow a single farmer to produce enough food to feed hundreds or even thousands of people. This is an exponential increase in calorie production per capita, achieved with a fraction of human labour input compared to the past.

Similarly, before mechanised transport, the movement of goods and people was constrained by human or animal power. A person could only pull a carriage or carry a load for a limited distance. Now, with the advent of combustion engines and mass infrastructure like roads, highways, and pipelines, not only can each individual own and operate vehicles such as cars, but society at large benefits from the rapid, inexpensive movement of goods and people.

Democratisation of transport has reshaped economies, enabling mass markets, suburban expansion, and global trade.

Other examples include:

• Textile production: Before the Industrial Revolution, spinning and weaving were painstaking manual tasks. The spinning jenny and power loom exponentially multiplied output, democratizing access to clothing and textiles.
• Communication: Telegraph and telephone technologies revolutionised the speed and reach of information, previously limited to letters carried by messengers.
• Electricity: Once confined to wealthy estates or factories, electrification spread to households worldwide, enabling lighting, refrigeration, and new appliances that transformed everyday life.

These transitions did not just increase output but spread consumption widely, turning luxuries into accessible goods for broad populations—a defining feature of modern consumer societies as a result of technological change.

THE INFLUENCE OF GUTENBERG’S PRINTING PRESS ON THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND ITS MODERN PARALLEL IN THE INTERNET

Johannes Gutenberg’s invention of the movable type printing press in the mid-15th century was arguably the most disruptive technological advancement before the Industrial Revolution. It democratized access to information and ideas in a way that was previously unimaginable—from manuscripts painstakingly copied by hand to mass-produced books and pamphlets available at a fraction of the cost and in unprecedented quantities.

This revolution in information dissemination enabled the spread of literacy, scientific knowledge, and revolutionary ideas. The printing press created a feedback loop of innovation: new ideas spread rapidly, fueling scientific inquiry, technological experimentation, and new economic theories—all critical components that sparked and sustained the Industrial Revolution.

Without Gutenberg’s press, the vast accumulation and sharing of knowledge that powered inventors, engineers, and entrepreneurs in the 18th and 19th centuries would have been severely constrained.

Fast forward to today, the internet functions as a modern “Gutenberg press”—but on an exponentially larger, faster, and more interactive scale. It democratises not only information but also production and distribution of content globally, breaking down barriers of geography, class, and education.

• Just as the printing press spread knowledge beyond elite scholars to the general public, the internet places vast libraries, educational courses, and real-time communication in the hands of billions.
• Like Gutenberg’s press accelerated the pace of innovation and cultural shifts, the internet enables rapid technological development, startup culture, social movements, and real-time political change.
• The decentralisation of content creation and distribution mirrors how movable type freed authors and publishers from costly, gate-kept manuscript production.

In essence, the internet amplifies the democratizing, catalytic effects Gutenberg’s press initiated, marking a new turning point in human civilisation where information, creativity, and power to influence are more broadly shared than ever before.

CONCLUSION: WHY CHRISTIANS MUST BECOME EARLY ADOPTERS—OF TOOLS AND OF TIMES

Christianity has never merely survived change. It has often led it. From the scroll to the codex, from the printing press to radio, from social reform to the abolition of slavery—Spirit-filled men and women have repeatedly stood in the gap during pivotal shifts in history. Now, as the AI age dawns, we are once again being summoned to the frontlines—not as alarmists, but as architects of ethical possibility.

If we believe that God is sovereign over history, then this moment is not a mistake. If we believe we carry the mind of Christ, then we are not meant to be digital serfs but digital shepherds. We are not meant to cower behind obsolete modes of ministry but to press forward and shape what God can do through innovation.

FIVE STEPS FOR CHRISTIANS TO ACT NOW

1. Renew Your Mind with a Kingdom Tech Theology
   Study the biblical pattern of stewardship, image-bearing, and creative power. Read Christian thinkers on AI ethics. Root yourself in a worldview that sees technology not as neutral but as a force to be disciplined.
2. Learn the Tools—Don’t Fear Them
   Engage hands-on with AI platforms, digital productivity tools, and automation workflows. Host training sessions in your church or small group. Curiosity is not carnality—it’s stewardship.
3. Disciple the Digital Space
   Create content that speaks truth, beauty, and grace into algorithmic spaces. Use AI to multiply your message. Establish Kingdom outposts in the digital wilderness—from chatbots to virtual missions.
4. Advocate for Ethical Design
   Participate in local, national, or global conversations on tech policy, privacy, and justice. Vote with your money. Support developers and companies who uphold human dignity and transparency.
5. Raise Up Josephs and Daniels
   Invest in the next generation. Train Kingdom-minded data scientists, programmers, ethicists, and entrepreneurs who will lead with excellence in AI spaces—not only interpreting dreams but building the future.

Let it not be said that the Church slept while empires pivoted. Let it be said that when the world stood confused at the gates of the next age—the people of God were already building.

• Shall we be the tail or the head?
• The laggards of history or its architects?

The choice—and the calling—is ours.

KEY STATEMENT

The Church is not called to survive transitions it is called to shape them. Now is the time for Christians to rise as ethical innovators, prophetic technologists, and faithful stewards in the age of AI.

MEMORY VERSE

“The sons of Issachar, who had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do…”
(Chronicles 12:32, NKJV)

DEVOTIONAL PRAYER

Father of Time and Eternity,
You hold the ages in Your hand and appoint the seasons by Your wisdom. Today, I ask You to give me discernment like the sons of Issachar—to understand the time I am living in and know what I must do. Break the spirit of fear and apathy in me. Deliver me from nostalgia and teach me how to build with heaven’s blueprints in a world of shifting sands. Let me not be swept away by change, but empowered by Your Spirit to shape it. Teach my hands to code as You taught David’s hands to war. May I rise not as a reactor, but as a reformer—not just to survive, but to serve and shine with excellence. In Jesus’ name,
Amen.

QUESTIONS FOR REFLECTION

1. Do I see technological disruption as a threat or an opportunity for Kingdom advancement?
2. In what ways have I been resisting change instead of discerning God’s invitation within it?
3. How can I practically learn and leverage emerging tools like AI in a way that reflects Christ’s character?
4. Who in my sphere of influence is being affected by the digital transition—and how can I support or disciple them?
5. What legacy am I building for the next generation in this pivotal moment of history?

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE

RELATED RESOURCE (AMAZON AFFILIATE LINKS)

ABOLITION OF SLAVERY

SOCIETAL CYCLES

HAS THIS POST HELPED YOU?

RELATED POSTS