VIDEO

PODCAST

I have spent decades walking with God, reading His Word, and observing the currents of history. Yet, as I open Daniel 1, I feel as though I am reading today’s news, a prophetic headline for the West. The exile of Judah, the stripping away of identity, the imposition of foreign diets, names, and customs—all of it speaks directly to the spiritual condition of our nations, our churches, and even our personal lives. Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah were taken to Babylon, and though centuries have passed, the strategies employed against them echo loudly in our contemporary world.

THE FALL OF JUDAH AND THE 70-YEAR DIVINE CLOCK

Daniel 1:1–6 recounts the first deportation of Judah in 605 BC, following the Battle of Carchemish. Nebuchadnezzar asserted dominance over the land, and Jehoiakim became a Babylonian vassal. Daniel and his friends were taken “young men in whom was no blemish, but well-favoured, and skilful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science” (Daniel 1:4). These young men represent the cosiety of Judah’s best and brightest. Their removal was not simply political—it was spiritual and cultural, a deliberate act of social engineering to undermine their political, spiritual, cultural and economic autonomy.

The Bible tells us that God had decreed the length of this exile. Jeremiah writes:

“This whole land shall become a ruin and a waste, and these nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years. Then, after seventy years are completed, I will punish the king of Babylon…”
—Jeremiah 25:11–12

And again:

“When seventy years are completed for Babylon, I will visit you and fulfil my promise and bring you back to this place.”
—Jeremiah 29:10

Daniel recognised the prophetic pattern:

“In the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the books the number of years that, according to the word of the LORD to Jeremiah, must be fulfilled for the desolations of Jerusalem—seventy years.”
—Daniel 9:2

Rashi comments on this:

“The seventy years correspond to the Sabbaths that the land had been deprived; as it is written, ‘Until the land had enjoyed its Sabbaths’ (2 Chronicles 36:21). Thus, the exile was a repayment for the land’s rest that was denied.”

Matthew Henry adds a layer of reflection:

“Here we see the justice of God in punishing a sinful nation by a foreign power, yet with a limit of mercy, for seventy years, after which He brings His people back.”

The seventy years, then, are not arbitrary. They are a divine timetable, a perfect cycle of correction, a measure of completion. Yet the lesson transcends history: just as Judah had to reckon with their covenantal failings, we too must reckon with the Babylon that exists in our minds, our cultures, and our churches.

IF WE NEGLECT SPIRITUAL SABBATH, WE FORFEIT OUR INHERITANCE

If Israel’s neglect of Sabbath led to exile and a ruined land, the same spiritual law still operates for us. The Sabbath was never merely a day; it was a state of trust—a covenant posture of resting in God’s provision. When they abandoned Sabbath, God said:

“Then the land shall enjoy its Sabbaths…”
— Leviticus 26:34–35

The neglected rest was collected back by force through exile.

Hebrews 4 tells us this was prophetic:

“There remains therefore a Sabbath-rest [sabbatismos] for the people of God…For the one who has entered His rest has also ceased from his own works.”
— Hebrews 4:9–10

The author is clear:

This rest is not Saturday, not Canaan, not a holiday, but Christ Himself.

To “neglect spiritual Sabbath” is to continue striving, building, hustling, fixing, defending, and proving ourselves—as though Christ is not enough and His finished work is incomplete.

When we live this way, our inner land becomes ruined—dry, hardened, overworked, depleted—just as Judah’s land became desolate when they refused to let it rest.

SOLOMON: THE SHADOW OF THE TRUE REST

To understand what God intended, Scripture sends us to Solomon.

“But now the LORD my God has given me rest on every side—
There is neither adversary nor disaster.”
— 1 Kings 5:4

This “rest” was not laziness; it was a God-given condition where enemies lost power and prosperity flowed. Solomon’s reign represents:

• security,
• peace,
• prosperity,
• unhindered building,
• no harassment from nations.

This was God saying:
“This is the picture. This is what life under My rule looks like.”

It was an earthly shadow of our spiritual inheritance in Christ.

ETYMLOGY: SOLOMON = SHALOM = WHOLENESS

Solomon (שְׁלֹמֹה Shĕlōmoh) comes from the root shalom (שָׁלוֹם), meaning:

• completeness
• wholeness
• flourishing
• harmony
• peace after conflict
• restored order

The verb behind shalom is shalem / shalam (שָׁלֵם / שָׁלַם):

• to make whole
• to restore
• to repay or reconcile
• to complete what was missing

This is covenant language. Shalom is the presence of divine order. Solomon embodied this concept. Christ fulfils it.

THE SHULAMITE: THE BRIDE WHO SHARES HIS NAME

In Song of Songs, the bride is called:

“the Shulamite” —Song 6:13

Shulamite = feminine form of Solomon.
(שׁוּלַמִּית Shulammît)

It is deeply symbolic:

She—the shulumite, the bride—shares his name because she shares his nature.

prophetically, she is:

• the Bride of Christ,
• the Church,
• the restored people of God who receive His identity,
• the beloved who is formed into the same likeness of shalom.

She is Shulamite because she is becoming what he is:

whole, at rest, complete, flourishing, reconciled, secure.

This is why the entire poem is a drama of transformation—from insecure striving to confident rest.

THE SPIRITUAL IMPLICATION

If Israel’s land fell into ruin when Sabbath was neglected, the warning holds for us—not as condemnation but revelation:

When we cease practising spiritual rest—trust, surrender, dependence—our inner world becomes desolate, and we miss the inheritance Christ purchased.

→ Christ is our Solomon.
→ Christ is our Shalom (peace) & shalam (wholeness, restoration).
→ Christ is our Rest.

He is the One who gives us:

• rest from the adversary (1 Kings 5:4),
• rest from accusation (Romans 8:33–34),
• rest from fear (1 John 4:18),
• rest from striving (Matthew 11:28–30).

To neglect spiritual Sabbath is to live as though we are still exiles rather than sons.

If we too neglect the practice of spiritual Sabbath—abiding in Christ, trusting His finished work—our inward land becomes exhausted, barren, and vulnerable. We forfeit the inheritance that God intends for us: life under the reign of Christ our Solomon, the embodiment of shalom.

Just as Solomon enjoyed rest from all surrounding nations (1 Kings 5:4), so too are we called into a supernatural rest where Christ Himself becomes our protection, prosperity, and peace. His name—rooted in shalam, “to make whole, restore, complete”—is the very identity He shares with His bride, the Shulamite.

To embrace spiritual Sabbath is to live from this shared identity: whole, reconciled, flourishing, and fully at rest in the One who is Himself our divine inheritance.

BEL, BAAL, HUBAL: THE SPIRITUAL WAR FOR IDENTITY

As I meditate on Daniel 1, I see that the exiles were forced into a culture dominated by foreign gods. The Babylonians worshipped Bel meaning “master”, a title linguistically connected to Baal—the Canaanite “lord”—and the later Islamic Hubal, a deity imported from Northern Arabian traditions. Bel, Baal, Hubal—all represent the same spiritual principle: a foreign authority imposed to redirect loyalty, reshape identity, and confuse the soul—all represent a Lord/master other than the one true God.

The challenge Daniel and his friends faced was not external alone, but internal. Names were changed, food was controlled, and education was co-opted to redefine them. Daniel 1:7 records:

“Unto them he gave names: Daniel he called Belteshazzar; Hananiah, Shadrach; Mishael, Meshach; Azariah, Abednego.”

Even our names, in the biblical view, are portals of identity, and the imposition of a foreign name can begin the subtle theft of self. Rashi observes:

“Names are changed to remove the connection to God; he who is called by another’s name is in danger of losing his own soul’s path.”

Matthew Henry elaborates:

“They were removed from their native land, their language, and their God; their names were altered to assimilate them to the Babylonian court, a picture of the world’s seduction and the danger of conformity.”

Today the primary symptom of the west can be names as Identity Crisis in every facet of life expand.

FOOD, EDUCATION, AND IDENTITY

Food is identity—not just culturally, but also spiritually. Communion reminds us of this truth: bread and wine are not mere ritual; they are the embodiment of spiritual connection, the tangible expression of covenant relationship. Daniel and his friends were offered the king’s delicacies, yet they refused:

“Prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days; and let them give us pulse to eat, and water to drink. Then let our countenances be looked upon before thee, and the countenance of the children that eat the portion of the king’s meat be seen; and as thou seest, deal with thy servants.”
—Daniel 1:12–13

Even a small concession, an easy indulgence, could begin a slippery slope away from who they were meant to be. Matthew Henry notes:

“They feared that if they ate of the king’s meat they would be defiled; food is a test of obedience and an instrument of discipline, showing that holiness extends to all things.”

The slippery slope of identity crisis begins with an appeal to the flesh—in this case, food.

Education, too, was weaponised. Babylonian “degrees” and learning, while impressive, were intended to assimilate the young into a foreign worldview, to teach loyalty to empire rather than God. The very best of Judah’s youth were trained in this system: a brilliant display of what we might today call brain drain or economic sabotage—stealing Judah’s future.

“A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots.” —Marcus Garvey

Why does our modern system of learning and accreditation award “degrees”? The very language reveals its origins. It is chained to the same intellectual architecture that animated the Freemasonic vision of rebuilding Babel — a man-made tower of enlightenment that ascends by increments, by degrees, by human achievement rather than divine revelation.

And the tragedy is this: even the Church has slowly baptised these worldly standards of “acceptable learning” and enthroned them as the criteria for teaching God’s people. In doing so, we have quietly replaced the Holy Spirit—the Teacher promised to the saints—with institutional approval, academic badges, and the credentials of Babylon.

Jesus said, “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.” —John 14:26

He also said:

“But the anointing that you received from him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about everything, and is true, and is no lie—just as it has taught you, abide in him.” —John 14:26

Yet our “degrees” absorb us into a cultural and identity-forming pipeline—one engineered to shape not only what we know but who we become, and who we are allowed to be within society. It is a subtle form of spiritual naturalisation: you enter the system as a disciple, but you graduate as a citizen of Babylon.

BABYLON’S TACTICS	MODERN PRESSURES
Foreign Names	Identity Crisis
King’s Diet	Consumerism
Imperial Education	Institutional Views

Noam Chomsky captured the mechanism perfectly:

“All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume.”

WEAPONISED MIGRATION: HISTORY REPEATS

Assyria had perfected a method of population control and cultural engineering centuries earlier, after the fall of Samaria (722/720 BC):

“The king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath and Sepharvaim, and settled them in the cities of Samaria in place of the Israelites.”
—2 Kings 17:24

Their strategy was simple but devastating: remove rebellious peoples, scatter them, import foreign colonists to break national identity. This created the mixed population we know today as Samaritans. The policy prevented uprisings, eroded cohesion, and destroyed a people’s historical and spiritual continuity.

This was the very strategy later perfected by the Assyrians in 720–722 BC under Shalmaneser V, who began the siege, and Sargon II, who completed the conquest (cf. 2 Kings 17:6, 24). Their method was simple but devastating: uproot populations, scatter them across foreign territories, and import outsiders to dilute identity, culture, memory, and resistance. It was psychological warfare on a national scale—a deliberate dismantling of covenant identity through forced assimilation.

Judah’s experience was different. Babylon did not import foreign settlers in the same way—they exiled and impoverished, leaving the land nearly empty. Yet the principle remains: the spiritual, cultural, and intellectual frameworks of a nation can be subtly occupied by a foreign power, leaving the people’s hearts and minds colonised long after the exiles return.

IDENTITY CRISIS: INTERNAL NOT EXTERNAL

As I consider Daniel, I see the warning: identity is internal, not external. External pressures—names, food, education, or social and political expectation—cannot define who we are in Christ unless we allow them. Daniel and his friends were surrounded by Babylonian culture, yet:

“As for these four children, God gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom; and Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams.”
— Daniel 1:17

Their strength did not come from degrees, credentials, or assimilation into the imperial system—it came from an inner life anchored in communion with God. This is something no liturgical ritual can manufacture. In many places, the ritual has quietly and insidiously replaced the reality; the symbol has become the substitute for the substance. We still use the same words—communion, fellowship, worship, devotion—but their meanings have shifted, hollowed out, redefined. And in that redefinition, we have been cut off from the very power that defined early Christianity: the living, breathing communion of the Spirit.

True communion is not merely a ceremony; it is a participation (koinōnia) in the life of Christ. The bread represents the words and the wine His Spirit—not religious tokens—they are formative forces. They build an inner identity that resists the corrosive pull of Babylon. To “eat of the king’s food,” as Daniel understood, is not simply to consume foreign cuisine; it is to adopt the values, loyalties, and identity of a counterfeit kingdom. But to feed on the Word—to allow the Spirit to be our Teacher—is to reaffirm our covenant identity in God. It is to declare, with every inward choice, “My life is sourced from another realm.”

SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND THE BRAIN DRAIN

We see a subtle but clear pattern: empires, past and present, attempt to weaken nations by removing their best and brightest. Daniel and his friends were selected for their skill, their appearance, their intellect. Today, this is mirrored in the global phenomenon we might call brain drain, where talented individuals are pulled from their home nations into foreign systems that shape their loyalty and worldview.

Today, this same objective is no longer carried out by invading armies or battering rams—but through political and economic pressure, disguised as progress, safety, or “global standards.” Nations are not conquered by spears but by sanctions, bureaucratic controls, economic manipulation and tax imperatives that slowly erode their sovereignty. Cultures are not displaced by foreign armies but by imported ideologies, engineered dependencies, and economic restructuring that reshape a people’s identity without ever firing a shot.

What Assyria once accomplished with forced relocation, modern powers accomplish through systems that condition compliance: regulations that suffocate small communities, international frameworks that override local conviction, and financial pressures that make cultural resistance feel impossible. It is assimilation—quiet, clinical, bloodless, but no less effective.

Like Babylon, the modern world seeks not merely to govern your life but to shape your inner world, to redefine what is normal, acceptable, and imaginable. And unless we root our identity in God rather than the systems of the age, we too become reshaped without realising it.

It is economic sabotage, yes, but more than that—it is spiritual and cultural warfare. If your education, your diet, your vocation, your very name is shaped to serve another empire, you risk forgetting who you are. You risk believing in a false identity, one imposed upon you by the world not Christ.

We must remember who we are named after—and this is only possible through true spiritual communion. Paul reminds us:

“Do this in remembrance of me.” —1 Corinthians 11:24

A secondary, more accurate rendering of Jesus’ command could read:

“Do this so that you will remember Me.”

This “remembrance” is not mere mental recall. It is a spiritual awakening—an inner re-alignment of the soul that has been lulled, numbed, and hypnotised by Babylon. In Scripture, to remember is to return to covenant consciousness, to come back into the reality of who we are in God.

Babylon’s goal is always the same: reshape identity. Rename us, re-educate us, absorb us into its culture until we forget our true origin. This was the strategy Daniel resisted—and it is still the pressure Christians face today.

Communion reverses that process. When we take the bread and the cup, something internal reignites. The fog begins to lift. We recover a sense of belonging that the world attempts to erode. We remember—not nostalgically, but spiritually—that our identity is in Christ, not in the empire.

This is why communion is participation, not ritual. It is the moment where Christ’s life becomes our life, His story becomes our story, and His identity reshapes ours from the inside out. In this way, communion becomes an act of resistance—a quiet but powerful stand against the cultural forces that seek to define us.

→ To eat from Babylon is to internalise Babylon.
→ To eat from Christ is to internalise Christ.

Ultimately you are what you eat. Either we sit at the table of the Lord or we sit at the troughs of the world. And in that choice, our true identity reawakens.

COMING OUT OF BABYLON

I often think about Israel’s exodus from Egypt. They left the land in a single night, but how long did it take for Egypt to leave them? An entire generation. They were freed physically, yet still imprisoned mentally—still shaped, branded, and bound by a slave identity. They did not see themselves as conquerors but as former captives waiting for someone to give them permission, direction, and validation.

This reveals something sobering:

You can come out of the world, but how long does it take for the world to come out of you?

Christian sanctification is about internal decolonisation. This is precisely Paul’s point in Romans 12:2: transformation is not instantaneous; it is an internal re-formation of identity.

The same pattern appears in Abraham. He left Ur, yet the journey of separating from its worldview took years and unfolded through covenant trial and revelation. Judah returned from exile, yet centuries of captivity, assimilation, and foreign influence had to be purged before true restoration could even begin. Leaving Babylon physically is one step; leaving Babylon spiritually is another.

For us, “coming out of Babylon” is not merely a declaration. It is an internal battle—a wrestling of identity, imagination, and formation. Babylon does not fight our bodies; it fights our consciousness. It seeks to colonise our inner world until we see ourselves through its labels instead of God’s.

The exodus is therefore a template:

God can deliver us in a moment, but it may take a lifetime to uproot the internal Egypt that shaped our imagination. The Spirit’s work is to free not just our circumstances but our identity—until we no longer think like slaves but like sons who know their inheritance, authority, and calling.

We are not only called to come out of Babylon but to:

• Evict foreign thoughts, patterns, and habits
• Reclaim the language, names, and practices that honour God
• Reassert spiritual priorities over worldly seductions

Bread is identity; wine is presence; food is not merely nutrition—it is communion, a spiritual reality that nurtures our internal man.

THE SPIRIT COMES UPON YOU

Daniel’s story reminds me of the verse,

“When the Spirit comes upon you, you will be changed into another man.” —1 Samuel 10:6

The power of God transforms identity from the inside out through His Spirit not from the outside in through our effort. It is never about the outward symbols, appearances, or cultural markers of Babylon; it is about a renewed mind and spirit. Our transformation does not come through rituals, church service, denominational affiliation, or even the vocabulary of Christianity. It comes from the presence of God dwelling within us. This is why we must enter His presence intentionally, frequently, and wholeheartedly—and why we must allow His Word to enter us with equal intensity. As the psalmist declares,

“I have hidden Your word in my heart, that I might not sin against You.” —Psalm 119:11

Internalised truth creates internal identity; the Spirit of God forms a new self that no external empire can defile.

Bel, Baal, Hubal—they all demand conformity. They promise status, comfort, and survival—but at the cost of identity. Daniel’s victory was internal: he was not conformed, yet he thrived. This is the challenge of our age: to walk in the spirit (by abiding), resist the subtle colonisation of culture, and maintain an identity rooted in Christ.

Daniel 1 is not merely ancient history; it is the evening news for the modern West. Babylon has not vanished—it has evolved. Its strategies remain the same: weaponised migration that destabilises nations, social engineering that reshapes identity, cultural brain drain that empties communities of their strength, and spiritual assimilation that replaces revelation with ritual. The forms have changed; the intent has not.

Yet Daniel and his friends stand as a living blueprint for us. They remind us that identity is forged internally, not assigned externally; that true communion is armour, not ceremony; that the Spirit transforms us from the inside out, insulating us from cultural hypnosis. They show us that holiness is not withdrawal but resistance—quiet, steady, uncompromising resistance born from communion with God.

So let us, like them, choose the narrow path.
Let us refuse the king’s delicacies—the ideologies, comforts, and compromises that rebrand our souls.
Let us live as new men and women in Christ, rooted in God, awake to His kingdom, and immune to the false lords of our age.

The ultimate rebellion against Babylon is abiding in Christ as a daily practice.

Babylon is loud, but it is not lord. Christ is Lord—and those who commune with Him cannot be conquered.

Whose table will you sit at?

DEVOTIONAL PRAYER

Father,
I thank You that You call me to an identity that is wholly Yours. Help me recognise the Babylon within me: the subtle pressures, the worldly seductions, the external forms that threaten to redefine who I am. Teach me to eat, to think, and to act in spiritual communion with You and Your word. Let Your Spirit come upon me and change me from the inside out, so that no name, no diet, no degree, no social expectation can steal my identity in Christ. Preserve me in holiness, grant me wisdom, and keep me anchored in Your truth. Amen.

REFLECTION QUESTIONS

1. Where have I allowed external pressures to define my identity more than God’s Word?
2. How does Daniel’s refusal to eat the king’s food challenge my personal habits, choices, and loyalties?
3. What are the “Babylons” in my own life—thoughts, systems, or structures—that need to be evicted?
4. How can I cultivate spiritual communion daily, so my internal identity aligns with God’s purposes?
5. What steps can I take to ensure my education, career, and community serve God rather than secular empires?